<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I love wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jaspsplace.co.uk/2006/11/17/why-i-love-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jaspsplace.co.uk/2006/11/17/why-i-love-wikipedia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:58:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why GO sucks &#171; Suicyte Notes</title>
		<link>http://blog.jaspsplace.co.uk/2006/11/17/why-i-love-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Why GO sucks &#171; Suicyte Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 01:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jaspsplace.co.uk/2006/11/17/why-i-love-wikipedia/#comment-549</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jun 24th, 2007 by suicyte    Please excuse the rude title of this post &#8211; it is crafted after a number of recent blog postings on the shortcomings of Wikipedia. I for myself have been a very late adaptor of wikipedia and had never expected much from this resource &#8211; whenever I am using it now, I am pleasantly surprised how useful it is, even for most scientific topics. Obviously, you cannot believe everything you find in Wikipedia, and I am quite concerned about the growing number of young students,  who apparently learn biochemistry from Wikipedia rather than from textbooks &#8211; this is certainly not the way to go. However, for a quick look-up of the formula of orlistat (tetrahydrolipstatin, &#8220;alli&#8220;) and stuff like that, Wikipedia is much more convenient than any other resource I know of. And, as has been said  before, nothing beats Wikipedia if you want to know the difference between a &#8216;mad scientist&#8217; and an &#8216;evil genius&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
